Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2022cv05066
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Leavy v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00915
Petitioner:
Carnell A Leavy
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed
Bernal v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv08014
Defendant:
Eve R. Berg, Joanne Person, Mirjana Nichiporuk Tolt and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maria Bernal
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Taylor et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2021cv00325
Defendant:
Goss & Goss, Inc., Stephanie J. Taylor and Andrea Marie Leavy
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Taylor, III and Michael E. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Edward Asner et al v. The Sag-Aftra Health Fund et al
as 2:2020cv10914
Defendant:
Michael Pniewski, Ned Vaughn, Amy Aquino and others
Plaintiff:
Sondra James Weil, Edward Asner, Raymond Harry Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
(PC) Adams v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Jose Gastelo, Steven Suzukawa, Kathleen Allison and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ou-Young v. Leavy et al
as 5:2019cv07232
Defendant:
Edward Leavy, Consuelo M. Callahan and Carlos T. Bea
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ou-Young v. Leavy et al
as 3:2019cv03049
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
Honorable Edward Leavy, Consuelo M. Callahan and Carlos T. Bea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonilla v. Leavy
as 3:2018cv03012
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
C. J. Leavy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
