Cases 1 - 10 of 142
ROSS v. WOODCOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
JUDGE WOODCOCK, ANDREW MCCORMACK, SCOTT KELLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Pike, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, Administrator at Somerset County Jail, D. GRAY, JAQUES, Sargent at Somerset County Jail and others
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, D GRAY, JAQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party:
KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Lees v. Alves
as 23-1824
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN LEES, a/k/a Brian Lee
Respondent / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES
Williams v. State of Maine
as 23-1440
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY LEE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF MAINE
Cruz v. Billadeau et al
as 1:2023cv10344
Plaintiff:
Felix Tomas Cruz
Defendant:
Billadeau, Bonito, Caverro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11379
Petitioner:
Brian Lee
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11355
Petitioner:
George Lee
Respondent:
A. Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEE v. RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
as 1:2022cv00258
Petitioner:
ADAM DAVID LEE
Respondent:
RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
