Cases 1 - 10 of 532
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee et al v. Alliance RV, LLC
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee and Ashleigh Lee
Defendant:
Alliance RV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ledford v. Waldo et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Meloday Waldo, LaPorte County Sheriff's Office, LaPorte County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ledford v. Waldo et al
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Meloday Waldo, LaPorte County Sheriff's Office, LaPorte County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Hawk v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Kosciusko County and Kosciusko County Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Hawk v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2024cv00252
Defendant:
Valerie Kay Lee and Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
