Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 636
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner: Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff: CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant: G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICKELL v. THIBAULT
as 1:2024cv00573
Plaintiff: PERRY LEE NICKELL
Defendant: THIBAULT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Hawk v. Indiana Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner: Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Respondent: Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: MARION LEE YOUNG, I
Defendant: WENDY RUSSELL, M. KOLHOUSE and KNOX CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. MCPHEARSON et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: IRA LEE COLLINS
Defendant: MCPHEARSON, MILLER and JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. FITCH et al
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff: JAMES M. JOHNSON
Defendant: SCOTT FITCH, TINA LEE and GEO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner: Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner: Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elzey et al v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Kortney Lee Elzey, Kortney Elzey, Dustin Havens, Sr. and others
Defendant: Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton and 24/7 Towing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?