Cases 31 - 40 of 378
Cray v. Hamilton
as 6:2023cv00074
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Cray
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adair v. Rankin
as 4:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Adair
Defendant:
Chris Rankin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Proctor v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Proctor
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Parris et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
John Everett Parris, Rachel Marie Dallis, Jeffery Bryant Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Harpe
as 4:2022cv00566
Petitioner:
Darren Lee Price, Jr
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Chennault et al
as 6:2022cv00369
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation, Jason Chennault and Sara Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mitchell v. Cherokee Nation
as 4:2022cv00534
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roberts v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Hurman Lee Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt and John OConnor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkerson v. Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2022cv00607
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Parkerson, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners, Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Oklahoma County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. Whitten
as 4:2022cv00307
Petitioner:
Glendell Dewayne Lee
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
