Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Rodricus Hurst v. Lee County, Mississippi
as 13-60540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRICUS CARLTEZ HURST
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-60686
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-60623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Larry Waites v. Lee County, Mississippi, et al
as 12-60236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY J. WAITES
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE COUNTY MISSISSIPPI, CITY OF TUPELO MISSISSIPPI, JACK REED, in his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Tupelo and others
Hurst v. Lee County, Mississippi
as 3:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Rodricus Carltez Hurst
Defendant:
Lee County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. Ellis et al
as 2:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Morris
Defendant:
Randy Ellis , Jenifer Moore , Wesley Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandra Parker v. Lee County, Mississippi, et al
as 11-60094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA L. PARKER, Individually and as the Administratrix of the Estate of William G. Williams, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE COUNTY MISSISSIPPI and JIM JOHNSON, Sheriff of Lee County, Mississippi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Waites v. Lee County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2009cv00287
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Waites
Defendant:
Lee County, Mississippi, City of Tupelo, Mississippi, Ed Neely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill et al v. North Mississippi Medical Center (NMMC) et al
as 1:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Cory Hill, Stefanie Hill and Plaintiffs 2-10
Defendant:
North Mississippi Medical Center (NMMC), Lee County Department of Human Services (LCDHS), Lee County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
