Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Peterson et al v. Osman et al
as 1:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jeanine Lee Peterson, Margaret Jean Stebbins and Amanda Lynn Peterson
Defendant:
Ahmed Mohamed Osman, Shakta Transportation LLC and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
PETERSON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01704
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE PETERSON JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cary Peterson v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70034
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CARY LEE PETERSON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
(PC) Peterson v. Alameda County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Cary Lee Peterson
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff Dept., Santa Rita Jail, Christopher Lorenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Cary Peterson
as 22-10317
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Cary Peterson v. USDC-CASJ
as 22-70250
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CARY LEE PETERSON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
PETERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2021cv20684
Petitioner:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Cary Peterson
as 21-3351
Petitioner:
In re: CARY LEE PETERSON
Respondent:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RVPLUS INC and MICHAEL A. HAMMER
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SEC v. RVPlus Inc, et al
as 21-3046
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
RVPLUS INC
Defendant / Appellant:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
