Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Trammell v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Demetruis Dion Trammell
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBee v. Daniels, et al. (INMATE 3)(MEMBER)
as 1:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. Daniels, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv01259
Plaintiff:
Fernando Diaz
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBee v. Daniels, et al. (INMATE 3)(LEAD)
as 1:2014cv01230
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McBee v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2014cv01230
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Kennedy v. Mobile, Alabama District Attor, et al
as 14-15411
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD D. KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee:
MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ROBIN D. SCALES, LEEPOSEY DANIELS and others
Grice v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv01168
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Grice
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels , Luther Strange and Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grady v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00991
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Ms. Jones and Captain McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00896
Plaintiff:
Leon Maurice Barnett
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels , State of Alabama and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noe v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00733
Plaintiff:
Woodburck Noe
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Luther Strange and Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
