Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
UNIVERSITY LEGAL SERVICES, INC. v. BOWSER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00301
Plaintiff: UNIVERSITY LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: MURIEL BOWSER , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and CLINTON LACEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02325
Plaintiff: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, MARIA DE LA CRUZ PERALES SANCHEZ and others
Defendant: DUKE C. ELAINE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Amicus Curiae: CAPITAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE, MASSACHUSETTS LAW REFORM INSTITUTE (MLRI) and others
Petitioner: SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO, CUNY DREAMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00745
Plaintiff: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party: ROB RAWSON, ROSEMARIE HOWELL and TROY LAW, PLLC
Petitioner: JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, DON KOZICH, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and others
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF ALTERNATIVE NEWS MEDIA, TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, THOMAS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2016cv00125
Plaintiff: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00914
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01915
Plaintiff: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM , VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA , ANGELO O. DURAN and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES ARMY, JOHN MCHUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. PENSION FUND et al v. AREP EMBASSY ROW LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01737
Plaintiff: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. PENSION FUND , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. GROUP LEGAL SERVICES FUND
Defendant: AREP EMBASSY ROW LLC and WILLOW 2015 LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. QUANTUM SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2010cv00809
Plaintiff: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNITE HERE LOCAL 25 AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. EMPLOYERS GROUP LEGAL SERVICES FUND
Defendant: QUANTUM SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
JANE DOE 1 et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2008cv01646
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JANE DOE 3 and others
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ADRIAN FENTY, PETER VIGILANCE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
NEUMAN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2008cv01068
Plaintiff: JAMES NEUMAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF COORDINATION AND REVIEW FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Consol Defendant: CONDOLEEZZA RICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?