Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Maxey v. Harris et al (JRG1)
as 2:2021cv00005
Defendant:
Samuel McCall, Jr., Santa Rosa Jr. College, Richard Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
James C Maxey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dwane Walker v. Eric Holder, et al
as 20-11477
Defendant / Appellee:
LEON PANETTA, Former CIA Director, ROBERT S. MUELLER, Former FBI Director and ERIC HOLDER, Former US Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWANE LASALLE WALKER
Ronald Boyajian v. United States Supreme Court
as 18-80066
:
In re: RONALD GERARD BOYAJIAN
Petitioner:
RONALD GERARD BOYAJIAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Real Party In Interest:
OM YENTIENG, SAR KHENG, ANG VONG VOTANA and others
WARREN v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01473
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WARREN
Defendant:
CIA and LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SALEM BIN ALI JABER et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
AHMED SALEM BIN ALI JABER and ESAM ABDULLAH ABDULMAHMOUD BIN ALI JABER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, LEON PANETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JETER v. PANETTA
as 1:2013cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jeter
Defendant:
Leon Panetta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
DOE v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CARTER v. BUSH et al
as 1:2012cv01825
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JETER v. PANETTA
as 1:2012cv01543
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JETER
Defendant:
LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
