Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al
as 14-16161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Rahinah Ibrahim v. USDHS, et al
as 14-16160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rahinah Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 09-17160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHINAH IBRAHIM, am individual
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, TOM RIDGE, in his official capacity as the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Stanley v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2007cv01541
Plaintiff:
Steven K. Stanley
Defendant:
Brian Kennedy, Patrick Mulahy, John T. OConnor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2007cv01329
Plaintiff:
Steven K. Stanley
Defendant:
Brian Kennedy, Patrick Mulahy, John T. O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroza,et al v. Palmer et al
as 3:2007cv00935
Plaintiff:
Patrick Carroza and John Butkevicius
Defendant:
August Palmer, III, Robert Duffy, Thomas Bergert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
