Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robinson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Nebraska Department of Corrections, Scott Frakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Ricketts, Doug Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Lewien
as 8:2022cv00215
Petitioner:
Frankie Levi Cole
Defendant:
Barbara Lewien
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Castonguay, Sr. v. Barbara Lewien
as 22-2262
Petitioner:
Paul Castonguay, Sr.
Respondent:
Barbara Lewien
Castonguay v. Lewien
as 8:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Paul Castonguay
Respondent:
Barbara Lewien
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lewien
as 8:2021cv00230
Petitioner:
Ronnie S. Smith
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Barbara Lewien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abram v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Don Kleine and others
Plaintiff:
RayShawn Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Lewien
as 8:2019cv00224
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Cotrell T. Knight
Respondent:
Barb Lewien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robertson v. Lewien
as 8:2019cv00104
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Barbara Lewien
Petitioner:
Anthony Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Lewien
as 8:2019cv00080
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Barb Lewien
Petitioner:
Reginald Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
