Cases 1 - 10 of 365
LEWIS v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIYO LEWIS
Defendant:
BEDWELL, AIRMARK and FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. MILBURG et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
LOREN CLYDE LEWIS
Defendant:
BRANDON MILBURG and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WARREN et al v. HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN, JR., LOREN LEWIS, JEFFREY SARVER and others
Defendant:
HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF and HOWARD COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SKINNER
as 1:2023cv02275
Plaintiff:
Jamarris H Lewis and JAMARRIS H. LEWIS
Defendant:
Tony Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02156
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DALE LEWIS
Respondent:
ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA and SAMUEL KIERNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
