Cases 41 - 50 of 381
YELVERTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. YELVERTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHAN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01705
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, C/O 1 J.E. LEWIS, C/O 1 PAVLIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lewis v. Warden of USP-Allenwood et al
as 1:2021cv01967
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Defendant:
Warden of USP-Allenwood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REID et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05108
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY REID, AARON JONES, CHRISTOPHER RONEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. SHOUPPE
as 2:2021cv01632
Petitioner:
GREGORY LEWIS BRADLEY, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN WILLIAM SHOUPPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PALUCH v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK LEWIS, MATTHEW KENDERSKI, MICHAEL HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RODRIGUEZ v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
LEWIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and SUPERINTENDANT DERICK OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01373
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, C/O 1 MCGINNIS, C/O 1 POLYBLANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson, Sr. v. USP-Canaan et al
as 1:2021cv01751
Plaintiff:
Dietrick Lewis Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
USP-Canaan, Warden Bradley, Counselor Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Passarella v. Lewis et al
as 3:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
William J. Passarella
Defendant:
Ms. Lewis, Supt. Mason and Mr. McGarry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
