Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ESIP Series 1, LLC v. doTerra International, LLC
as 23-1434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESIP SERIES 1, LLC and ESIP SERIES 2, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
DOTERRA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, PUZHEN, LLC and PUZHEN LIFE USA, LLC
Restore Life USA, et al v. LifeNews.com, et al
as 22-1411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RESTORE LIFE USA, INC. and JAMES BYRD
Defendant / Appellant:
LIFENEWS.COM and STEVEN ERTELT
ESIP Series 1, LLC v. doTerra International, LLC
as 21-2343
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESIP SERIES 1, LLC
Plaintiff:
ESIP SERIES 2, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
DOTERRA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, PUZHEN, LLC and PUZHEN LIFE USA, LLC
ESIP Series 1, LLC v. doTerra International, LLC
as 21-2239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESIP SERIES 1, LLC
Plaintiff:
ESIP SERIES 2, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
DOTERRA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, PUZHEN, LLC and PUZHEN LIFE USA, LLC
ESIP Series 2, LLCIn re: ESIP Series 2, LLC
as 21-164
Petitioner:
In re: ESIP SERIES 2, LLC
Respondent:
PUZHEN LIFE USA, LLC and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cool Springs Financial Group, LLC et al v. Albright et al
as 3:2019cv00964
Defendant:
Andrew S. Albright and Alliance Life, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Lee and Cool Springs Financial Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESIP Series 2, LLC v. Puzhen Life USA, LLC
as 19-1659
Appellee:
PUZHEN LIFE USA, LLC
Appellant:
ESIP SERIES 2, LLC
Restore Life USA, Inc. et al v. LifeNews.com et al
as 1:2018cv02472
Defendant:
LifeNews.com and Steven Ertelt
Plaintiff:
James Byrd and Restore Life USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Puzhen Life USA v. Homedics
as 2:2016cv01184
Plaintiff:
Puzhen Life USA
Defendant:
Homedics
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
