Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Edwards v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv01733
Plaintiff:
M. A. Edwards
Defendant:
Semple, Micah, Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Mann et al
as 3:2017cv01555
Plaintiff:
Davon Miller
Defendant:
Mann, Squires, Cavagnoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowder v. Farinella et al
as 3:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
Christopher H Crowder
Defendant:
Farinella, Freston, Naqui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2017cv00920
Plaintiff:
Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Syed Johar Naqvi , Sohrab Zahedi, Raquel Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Lightner et al
as 3:2017cv00691
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tanner
Defendant:
Racheal Lightner, Omprakash Pillia, Kevin McCrystal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. Murphy et al
as 17-638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony M. Navarro
Defendant - Appellee:
Murphy, Warden, individual and official capacity, Chapdelaine, Warden, individual and official capacity, Jane Doe, #1, individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
Hall, Captain, individual and official capacity, Gallagher, Ms., individual and official capacity, Cheryl A. Spano, individual and official capacity and others
Harnage v. Pillai et al
as 3:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Defendant:
Omprekash Pillai, David Giles, Lisa Caldonero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harnage v. Giles et al
as 3:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Defendant:
David Giles, Omprakesh Pillai, Rikel Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harnage v. Lightner et al
as 3:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Defendant:
Rikel Lightner, Wu, Pillai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Licari v. Semple et al
as 3:2016cv02124
Plaintiff:
Randal Licari
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Kevin Crystal, Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
