Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Rhodes v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2021cv00942
Plaintiff:
Percy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Christian Lightner, Curran, M. Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lightner v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2020cv10942
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Minimed, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Michael Lightner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lightner v. Neuschmid
as 5:2020cv05388
Petitioner:
James E. Lightner
Respondent:
R Neuschmid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lightner v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv06735
Plaintiff:
James E. Lightner
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Safeco Insurance Company of America et al v. Sulma Marina Carrasco de Lightner et al
as 2:2014cv08923
Defendant:
Sulma Marina Carrasco de Lightner, Cortez Tropical Marine Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
First National Insurance Company of America and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Charles Boyd et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Access Securepak, Alverez, Amador and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd, John Brown, Robert Castro and others
Blythe, Indio, RPDC, Smith, SWBC:
Riverside County Jail System
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Sulma Maria Carrasco De Lightner
as 2:2013cv08932
Defendant:
Sulma Maria Carrasco De Lightner
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Rosas et al v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2013cv00850
Plaintiff:
Raul Rosas and Eva Rosas
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Miguel Alvarez, Sammy Ashworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Sulma M Lightner
as 2:2011cv09563
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Sulma M Lightner
Lightner v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 4:2009cv02043
Plaintiff:
James Lightner and James Lightner
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, David Cushman, J. Patzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
