Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Lin v. Wray et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, DOJ, Chad Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Izquierdo et al v. Shanghai Lingce Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv01175
Defendant:
Shanghai Lingce Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Merlin Test Technologies Co., Ltd., Yue Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Gerard Izquierdo and Merlin Test Technologies, Inc.
Joyin US Corp v. Lin
as 3:2023cv01863
Plaintiff:
Joyin US Corp doing business as JoyinDirect
Defendant:
Jian Lin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Izquierdo v. Shanghai Lingce Electronic Technology Col, LTD et al
as 1:2023cv00793
Defendant:
Shanghai Lingce Electronic Technology Col, LTD, Shanghai Merlin Test Technologies Co., LTD., Yue Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Gerard Izquierdo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sabal v. Wood
as 4:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
John Sabal
Defendant:
Lin Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ra-Amari et al v. RE/MAX, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
James Ra-Amari, Misty Ra-Amari and Rosemary Afful
Defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC, EXP Realty, LLC, UMRE Investment Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Lin v. USA
as 3:2022cv01457
Petitioner:
Xiao Chen Lin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
