Cases 1 - 10 of 16
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LLM PLACEMENTS, LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv02190
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LLM PLACEMENTS, LLC. and LINDA M. MALLOY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
BRUNS et al v. USAA et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
MARK A. DAVIS, ROBERT WILKIE, DALTON BRYANT, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNY BRUNS and JEREMY BRUNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTER v. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2017cv02616
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. PORTER
Defendant:
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. FARIS et al
as 1:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
RONALD EUGENE WATSON
Defendant:
MARK H. WITTSTADT, ERIC VANDEL LINDE, MICHAEL KOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
CONNOLLY et al v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
ERNST & YOUNG LLP, KATHRYN A. OBERLY, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CONNOLLY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2008cv01927
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, W. LEE RAWLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01388
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
