Cases 1 - 10 of 10
National Retirement Fund v. Safety Wear, Inc.
as 2:2023mc51640
Plaintiff:
National Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Safety Wear, Inc. Safety Wear, Inc. d/b/a Midwest Linen and Uniform Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Seattle Times Company v. LeatherCare, Inc. et al
as 2:2016mc51127
Plaintiff:
Seattle Times Company
Defendant:
LeatherCare, Inc., Steven Ritt and Laurie Rosen-Ritt
Thirdparty_defendant:
Touchstone SLU, LLC, TB TS/RELP, LLC and American Linen Supply Co.
Respondent:
Hoyt Corporation
Venegas v. Valley City Linen Co.
as 1:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
Carlos Venegas
Defendant:
Valley City Linen Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ambris v. Reino Linen Service et al
as 2:2014cv12093
Defendant:
Reino Linen Service and Lindsay Young
Plaintiff:
Antonia Ambris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Burk v. Domestic Linen Supply and Laundry Company
as 2:2014cv11203
Plaintiff:
Curtis Burk
Defendant:
Domestic Linen Supply and Laundry Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Boren v. Continental Linen Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00562
Petitioner:
Dennis Boren
Respondent:
Continental Linen Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Hofstra et al v. Linens 'N Things, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01166
Plaintiff:
Mary Hofstra and Henry Hofstra
Defendant:
Linens 'N Things, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Caravel Ventures, LLC v. Progressive Textile, Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv14733
Plaintiff:
Caravel Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Progressive Textile, Incorporated, Fremont Laundry and Linen Supply, Incorporated and Theodore T Miller
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
