Cases 1 - 10 of 21
BROWN et al v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2023cv02966
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE J. BROWN, TAWANNA BROWN and JUWAN BROWN
Defendant:
DASHAWN BROOKS, MAYFLOWER LAUNDRY & LINEN and PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BROWN et al v. BROOKS et al
as 5:2023cv02966
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE J. BROWN, JR., TAWANNA BROWN and JUWAN BROWN
Defendant:
DASHAWN BROOKS, MAYFLOWER LAUNDRY & LINEN and PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP. v. DOMESTIC LINEN SUPPLY CO., INC.
as 2:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP.
Respondent:
DOMESTIC LINEN SUPPLY CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Graham v. Paris Uniform Rental and Supply et al
as 4:2017cv01832
Plaintiff:
Robert Graham
Defendant:
Paris Uniform Rental and Supply and Paris Healthcare Linen Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ACOSTA v. ELITE LINEN, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03476
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ELITE LINEN, LLC and JONATHAN LEVINSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DOMESTIC LINEN SUPPLY CO., INC. v. FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP.
as 2:2017cv03448
Plaintiff:
DOMESTIC LINEN SUPPLY CO., INC.
Defendant:
FOULKE MANAGEMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
