Cases 1 - 10 of 15
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. Qing Dao Lan Jing Ling Jiajuyouxiangsi
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC
Defendant:
Qing Dao Lan Jing Ling Jiajuyouxiangsi
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
McClain, III v. 1st Security Bank of Washington et al
as 2:2015cv01945
Plaintiff:
Charles V McClain, III
Defendant:
1st Security Bank of Washington , May-Ling , John Doe Sowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McClain v. 1st Security Bank of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv02277
Plaintiff:
Charles V McClain, III
Defendant:
1st Security Bank of Washington , May-Ling Sowell , John Doe Sowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ling et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
as 3:2013cv05610
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ling and Elizabeth Richins
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wu v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2013cv00955
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yih Ling Shieh Wu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Linge v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv05304
Plaintiff:
Rocky W. Linge
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Chan v. Chase Home Loans Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00273
Plaintiff:
Kwai Ling Chan
Defendant:
Chase Home Loans Inc and Reconstrust Company N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chan v. Chase Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 2:2011cv01599
Plaintiff:
Kwai Ling Chan
Defendant:
Chase Home Loans Servicing LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
