Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In re: Lionell Sanders
as 20-10588
Petitioner:
In re: LIONELL SANDERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lionell Sanders v. USA
as 17-13816
Petitioner - Appellant:
LIONELL SANDERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sanders v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22290
Plaintiff:
Lionell Sanders
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Lionell Sanders
as 14-12110
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LIONELL SANDERS, a.k.a. Pistol, a.k.a. Brisco
SANDERS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2013cv01534
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
LIONEL SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv02179
Plaintiff:
Lionel Sanders
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-02179
Plaintiff:
Lionel Sanders
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Melanson et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
as 5:2013cv00624
Plaintiff:
Melanie Melanson , Isaac Chailer , Virginia Chailer and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Melanson et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc
as OKW/5:13-cv-00624
Plaintiff:
Melanie Melanson , Isaac Chailer , Virginia Chailer and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
