Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mancini v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv02373
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mancini
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Mireles v. Info Group/Opinion Research Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00503
Defendant:
Destinee Allen, Andy, Angela and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Mireles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mancini v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
as 1:2009cv22319
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mancini
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Foreclose Ship's Mortgage
Watts et al v. San Mateo County Counsel Agency and Agents et al
as 5:2009cv02719
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watts and Inez Thompson
Defendant:
San Mateo County Counsel Agency and Agents, Thomas F. Casey, Portor Goltz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Watts et al v. The San Mateo County Counsel Agents et al
as 5:2009cv02720
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watts and Inez Thompson
Defendant:
The San Mateo County Counsel Agents, The San Mateo County Public Guardians Agency, The San Mateo County District Attorney Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Watts et al v. Pheiffer et al
as 5:2009cv02696
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watts and Inez Thompson
Defendant:
Rosemary Pheiffer, San Mateo County Counsel, Thomas F Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watts et al v. Pheiffer et al
as 3:2009cv02696
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watts and Inez Thompson
Defendant:
Rosemary Pheiffer, San Mateo County Counsel, Thomas F Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watts et al v. The San Mateo County Counsel and Agents et al
as 5:2009cv02690
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Watts and Inez Thompson
Defendant:
The San Mateo County Counsel and Agents, Portor Goltz, Thomas F Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
