Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv06327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Martinez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 7:2014cv06613
Plaintiff:
Lisa Martinez
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brianna Cobb et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv04330
Plaintiff:
Kelli Adams , Stephanie Campbell , Kelly Matthews and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Mullen
as 14-1381
Plaintiff:
Lisa Martinez
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sensational Smiles, LLC, DBA Smile Bright
Defendant - Appellee:
Jewel Mullen, Dr., in her official capacity as Commissioner of Public Health, Jeanne P. Strathearn, DDS in her offical capacity as a Member of the Connecticut Dental Commission, Elliot S. Berman, DDS, in his official capacity as a Member of the Connecticut Dental Commission and others
Martinez et al v. Skyline Automobiles, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08591
Plaintiff:
Phillip Martinez and Lisa Martinez
Defendant:
Skyline Automobiles, Inc. and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Martinez et al v. Mullen et al
as 3:2011cv01787
Plaintiff:
Lisa Martinez and Sensational Smiles, LLC
Defendant:
Jewel Mullen , Jeanne P. Strathearn , Lance E. Banwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
