Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jonathan T. Campos v. Don Barnes et al
as 8:2021cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jonathan T. Campos
Defendant:
Lisa Von Nordheim, Don Barnes and Joe Balicki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro Rodriguez, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-55770
Respondent:
NGUYEN, Officer-in-Charge, Theo Lacy Facility, DAVID MARIN, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, LUKE SOUTH, Commander, Theo Lacy Facility and others
Petitioner:
JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO, YUSSUF ABDIKADIR, ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ and others
Ubaldo Arroyo, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-55238
Defendant / Appellant:
JENNIFER HERRERA, Assistant Field Office Director, Orange County Detained Program, Los Angeles Field Office of ICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, LUKE SOUTH, Captain, Orange County Sheriff's Deparment Theo Lacy Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NGUANYI ATABONG QUEENIDA, BASHIR ABDI WABARE, ASMEROM ZEMEDE ENABI and others
Ms. J.P., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-56400
Defendant / Appellant:
LOWELL CLARK, Warden, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, and its Subordinate Entities, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, and its Subordinate Entities and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MS. J.P., MS. J.O. and MS. R.M., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02892
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ms. J.P. et al v. Jefferson B. Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv06081
Defendant:
Warden Lowell Clark, Director Marc J Moore, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. J.P., Ms. R.M. and Ms. J.O.
Amicus Curiae:
Alliance for Children's Right
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
