Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Leen Kawas, Kelly A. Romano, Joseph Edelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Athira Pharma, Inc.
Fairshare Vacation Owners Association v. Carolyn Nolen, et al
as 21-90020
Petitioner:
FAIRSHARE VACATION OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
CAROLYN NOLEN, WINDY KELLEY, CARA KELLEY and others
Glicenia Logan v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp, et al
as 20-2940
Defendant / Appellee:
Mellon Financial, Dreyfus Investment Advisors, The Vanguard Group and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glicenia C. Logan
Papapietro v. Popular Mortgage Servicing Com
as 20-2807
Defendant / Appellee:
Popular Mortgage Servicing Company, Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.P. and Litton Loan Servicing, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Rocco Papapietro
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Papapietro
Mary Martin, et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 20-3463
Defendant / Appellee:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2004-16CB and LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD L. PARKS, JR. and MARY A. MARTIN
Papapietro v. Popular Mortgage Servicing Com
as 20-1179
Plaintiff:
Rocco Papapietro
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Papapietro
Defendant / Appellee:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.P. and Litton Loan Servicing, L.P.
Defendant:
Popular Mortgage Servicing Company
Charles Morris v. Kendal May, et al
as 19-14884
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL LUCANTE, Officer, KENDAL MAY, Officer, CORIZON LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Charles Morris v. Kendal May, et al
as 19-14300
Defendant / Appellee:
KENDAL MAY, Officer, DANIEL LUCANTE, CORIZON LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES LITTON MORRIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
