Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PATEL v. LIU et al
as 1:2023cv02699
Plaintiff:
KASHYAP PATEL and ROD ROSENSTEIN
Defendant:
JESSIE K. LIU, ROBERT HUR, ED O'CALLAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LIU v. PALMERCARE CHIROPRACTIC WASHINGTON, PC et al
as 1:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
YUDAN LIU
Defendant:
PALMERCARE CHIROPRACTIC WASHINGTON, PC, COREY MALNIKOF and VIVIAN MALNIKOF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LIU v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00495
Plaintiff:
XUNXIAN LIU
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIU v. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS et al
as 1:2021cv00494
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE US COURTS
Plaintiff:
XUNXIAN LIU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAI v. SHERWIN et al
as 1:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
JIEMIN BAI
Defendant:
MICHAEL R SHERWIN, JESSIE K. LIU and MICHAEL R. SHERWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. GRIESA et al
as 1:2021cv00265
Defendant:
COLLEEN MCMAHOON, CLERK, YENNI LIU and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. EASTERLY et al
as 1:2020cv00608
Defendant:
CATHARINE FRIEND EASTERLY, ALICIA LONG, JOSE M. LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ZAFARAH I. BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
