Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hyppolite, III v. Kendall et al
as 8:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ralph J. Hyppolite, III
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Lloyd J. Austin, III, Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. Austin et al
as 8:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Carrisa L. Thompson
Defendant:
The Honorable Lloyd J. Austin, III, Kendall Frank III and Physical Disability Board of Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Ganiszewski v. Austin et al
as 8:2023cv02195
Plaintiff:
Francis M. Ganiszewski
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, The Honorable Carlos Del Toro and Physical Disability Board of Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Ganiszewski v. Austin et al
as 1:2023cv02195
Plaintiff:
Francis M. Ganiszewski
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, The Honorable Carlos Del Toro and Physical Disability Board of Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Olson v. Austin, et al
as 8:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Olson
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
