Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Laber v. Austin
as 23-3157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STAN LABER
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Secretary, United States Department of Defense
Weimer v. Smith, et al
as 23-6115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD WEIMER
Defendant / Appellee:
FRED COLSON SMITH, JR., CHARLES WHITTINGTON, INAS YACOUB and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Weimer v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Weimer
Defendant:
Fred Colson Smith, Charles Whittington, Inas Yacoub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miller et al v. United States Department of Defense Secretary et al
as 2:2022cv00118
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense Secretary, United States Air Force Secretary, United States Air Force Surgeon General and others
Plaintiff:
TSGT Nicholas Miller and TSGT Levi L Lindskog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Employment
Morrison v. Austin et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jona Morrison
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Dennis Goodnight, James Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
