Cases 11 - 20 of 380
Kevin Theriot v. Daniel LeSatz, et al
as 19-1278
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HOFFNER, ARUS, OFFICER GOSS, DONALD RICUMSTRICT, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN DWAYNE THERIOT
Goldman v. Elum et al
as 2:2019cv10390
Defendant:
Deborah Loop, Kevin Grace, Kieber and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Morgan #746570 v. Trierweiler et al
as 2:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Kenneth McGee, Lloyd Rapelje, Jared Buchin and others
Plaintiff:
Asheton S. Morgan #746570
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Delangelo Johnson v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 17-1230
Petitioner - Appellant:
DELANGELO JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LLOYD RAPELJE
Antoine Conley v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 17-1115
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTOINE CONLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
LLOYD RAPELJE
D'Andre Alexander v. Russell Vittitow, et al
as 17-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANDRE ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL VITTITOW, ROBERT NORTON, LLOYD RAPELJE and others
Rose #235893 v. Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Willie Rose #235893
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jeri-Ann Sherry, Unknown McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
