Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Matthew Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04958
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Micheal Jones, Sarah Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lona Williams v. C.I.W. Prison
as 2:2022cv01034
Petitioner:
Lona Williams
Respondent:
C.I.W. Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvaro Carrillo Aguilera v. E. Ramos et al
as 2:2021cv01913
Defendant:
Officer E. Ramos (#679, Officer Balzano (#677), El Monte Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Carrillo Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eric Garcia et al v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2021cv00460
Defendant:
City of El Monte, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Does 8 through 50, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Haro, Karen Garcia, Michael Cabrera and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard Copeland and Leonard Levy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lona's Lil Eats, LLC v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 3:2020cv06703
Plaintiff:
Lona's Lil Eats, LLC
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel v. The Will of Raymond Charles Van den Heuvel et al
as 2:2020cv04039
Defendant:
Lona Van Den Heuvel, The Will of Raymond Charles Van den Heuvel and Robert Van Den Heuvel
Plaintiff:
Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel v. Lona Ginsburg Van Den Heuvel et al
as 2:2020cv02087
Defendant:
Lona Ginsburg Van Den Heuvel and Robert Van Den Heuvel
Plaintiff:
Jean Marc Van Den Heuvel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Love v. Dale Dean Draayer et al
as 5:2018cv00593
Defendant:
Angel View, Inc., Does, Dale Dean Draayer and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
