Cases 1 - 10 of 74
(HC) Lopes v. Borla
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Manuel D. Lopes
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The VR School et al v. California Department of Education et al
as 3:2023cv06286
Petitioner:
The VR School and Dr. Freedom Cheteni
Respondent:
California Department of Education, Malia Vella and Carrie Lopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv09224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez et al v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09080
Plaintiff:
Abimael Enrique Corea Lopez, Adan Edilber Cuadra Mejia, Adolfo Bladimiro Flores Cruz and others
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC) Lopes v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lopes
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Lima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Lopes v. Pelosi et al
as 3:2021cv09379
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lopes
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Xavier Becerra, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lopes v. SEIU Local 1000 et al
as 2:2021at01075
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lopes
Defendant:
SEIU Local 1000 and Richard L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
