Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Capital S Investment Company Inc. et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Capital S Investment Company Inc. and Karol Haim Schwartz
Defendant:
Director, NSC Loren K. Miller, Dir, USCIS Tracy Renaud, Sec., DHS Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv11798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fernandes v. Miller et al
as 2:2022cv12335
Plaintiff:
Neil Gordon Fernandes
Defendant:
Director, NSC Loren K. Miller, Dir., USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Sec., DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gusain et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Mayank Gusain and Prachi Rawat
Defendant:
Ur Jaddou and Loren Miller
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mohammed v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2022cv12031
Plaintiff:
Zoheb Hussain Mohammed
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Loren K. Miller
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
