Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Arrow Legal Solutions Group et al v. Maughan et al
as 2:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Arrow Legal Solutions Group, Loren M Lambert, Cecilia Salazar and others
Defendant:
Jaceson R Maughan, Christopher C Hill, Aurora Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Quero v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Petitioner:
Abraham Quero
Respondent:
US Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Hackford v. State of Utah, The et al
as 2:2018cv00631
Defendant:
Sean D. Reyes, Loren Anderson, G. Mark Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Douglas Hackford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gale v. Uintah County et al
as 2:2013cv00725
Plaintiff:
Denile Gale
Defendant:
Uintah County, Loren W. Anderson and Jeff Merrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. Logan et al
as 1:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Christine E. Logan
Defendant:
David M. Logan , Loren L. Logan , William M. Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Pantone v. Eisenman et al
as 2:2010cv00449
Plaintiff:
Paul Pantone
Defendant:
Susan Eisenman, Dannette Faretta Brady, Todd Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
