Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Eason v. Strength of Nature LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv11328
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Strength of Nature LLC., Avlon Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Eason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12148
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Jackson
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Loreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07138
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Lane
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Softsheen Carson, LLC and others
Executor:
Alysia Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Groves-Colon v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv04806
Plaintiff:
Lorrie A. Groves-Colon
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Burns et al v. Dejoy
as 1:2022cv03895
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Burns and South Suburban Local APWU #6591
Defendant:
Louis Dejoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Street v. Footprint Acquisition, LLC
as 1:2021cv02975
Defendant:
Footprint Acquisition, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lorri Street
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sowko v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lorrie M. Sowko
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Taylor v. Henry County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv04241
Defendant:
Callie Anderson, R Cervantes, . Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Cassel Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02222
Plaintiff:
Lorrie G. Polley and Lorrie G Polley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lashley v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2020cv03893
Defendant:
Kim Fox, Robert D. Vanna, Sharon M. Huffman and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Lashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
