Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Love v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01760
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Love
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Caskey et al v. Anthem Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv03033
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Caskey, Robert Jolly and Michelle Stewart
Defendant:
Anthem Life Insurance Company, The Anthem Companies, Inc. and Elevance Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Smith
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Maroni v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Maroni
Defendant:
DAVOL, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2022cv02323
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Brown
Defendant:
Dorothy Whitaker, Lorri Shuler and Polly Schmalz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crowe v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03343
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Crowe
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Tyrice Hill
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, J. Tracey Sniderhan, Kayla Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Campana et al v. Kaman & Cusimano LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
William A. Campana and Linda Campana
Defendant:
Kaman & Cusimano LLC, Joseph E. Di Baggio, Magistrate Kandi S. O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pryor, v. Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05595
Plaintiff:
Tylesha Lorrie Pryor,
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Day v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06300
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lorri K. Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
