Cases 51 - 60 of 289
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of California et al v. Trump et al
as 5:2020cv05169
Plaintiff:
City Of Oakland, Los Angeles Unified School District, City of Long Beach and others
Defendant:
U.S. Census Bureau, Wilbur L. Ross, Donald J. Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
Libby Garland, Ron Wyden, Steven Ruggles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Michael Asfall v. LAUSD
as 20-55639
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ASFALL
Los Angeles Unified School District v. S&W Atlas Iron & Metal Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05330
Defendant:
Does 1-10, 10019 S. Alameda LLC, S&W Atlas Iron & Metal Co., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Los Angeles Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05270
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Michael Asfall v. LAUSD
as 20-55599
Defendant / Appellant:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ASFALL
Thomas Few v. UTLA, et al
as 20-55338
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES, AUSTIN BEUTNER and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS FEW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02628
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
