Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shabazz v. Lowe et al
as 3:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Sheikh Shabazz
Defendant:
Jason Lowe, Fred Bull and Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Tsham et al
as 3:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Capt. Jeff Tsham, Dep. Susan Fleming, Lt. Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Garton et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Mark Garton, Kelvin Lowe, Jared Vorhees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. Borello et al
as 2:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nam Nguyen
Defendant:
Daryl Borello, Stuart Young, Ms. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Fuhre
as 6:2023cv00756
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Cory Fuhre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Polk Co. Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Andrew Laud Barnett
Defendant:
Polk Co. Jail, Mark Garton, Jeff Isham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Jail Sgt. Lowe, Jail Lt. Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County, Mark Garton, Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Oregon State Penitentiary
as 6:2022cv01219
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lewis Lowe and Gilbert Lewis Lane
Respondent:
Oregon State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shabazz v. Lowe et al
as 6:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Sheikh Shabazz
Defendant:
Jason Allen Lowe and Deputy Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
