Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 817
Reed v. Bean, et al.
as 24-2705
Plaintiff: DAVID L REED
Defendant: BEAN, Associate Warden, Lt GLENN FOWLER, JAMES DZURENDA, Director and others
Moore v. Stolsig, et al.
as 24-2704
Plaintiff: KEVIN MOE MOORE
Defendant: MELISSA STOLSIG, JONNA DONLAP, ALICIA NIX and others
Johnson v. Holms, et al.
as 24-2402
Plaintiff: ADRIAN JOHNSON
Defendant: Sgt D HOLMS, CULLINA, Correctional Officer, BINKO, Correctional Officer and others
Dawes v. Ausbury, et al.
as 24-1924
Plaintiff: WILLIAM DAWES
Defendant: HOWARD AUSBURY, Lt. at RJD, MARIO ZUNIGA, Correctional Officer, SHELLANO, Correctional Officer and others
Richard v. Fischer
as 24-793
Defendant: Ms. DIGNEAN, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, THOMAS TANEA, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of DOCCS and others
Plaintiff: JOHN WILLIS RICHARD
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff: CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant: JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Spence v. Lower Buckeye Jail, et al.
as 24-1630
Defendant: PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff, LOWER BUCKEYE JAIL, MCSO Facility, Paul Pensone and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER A SPENCE
Sanchez v. Bell
as 24-622
Plaintiff: JORGE SANCHEZ
Defendant: BELL, Officer, CALLENDER, LT., MANIK, A.D.A/Unit Manager and others
Gess et al v. BAM Trading Services, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff: Adin Gess, Noach Newman, Maya Parizer and others
Defendant: BAM Trading Services, Inc. d/b/a Binance.us, Binance Holdings, Lts., d/b/a/ Binance, ChangPeng Zhao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1350 Alien's action for tort
Aigbekaen v. Gillepsie
as 24-428
Defendant: WARDEN, WARDEN, FCI Danbury, GILLEPSIE, Lt., DURANT, Lt. and others
Plaintiff: RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?