Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Preterm-Cleveland et al v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv00360
Defendant:
Hamilton County Prosecutor, Mahoning County Prosecutor, Franklin County Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, M.D. Sharon Liner, Capital Care Network of Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doremus v. Toledo Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv01198
Plaintiff:
Stanley B. Doremus
Defendant:
Toledo Police Department, Michael Navarre, Officer Hanus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 09-3920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, ROSS CIRINCIONE, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 08-4559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, KATHARINE LANG BETTASSO, in her official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
EJS Properties, LLC v. City of Toledo et al
as 3:2004cv07312
Plaintiff:
EJS Properties, LLC
Defendant:
City of Toledo and Robert McCloskey
Movant:
Wade Kapszukiewicz
Interested_party:
United States of America and Lucas County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
