Cases 21 - 30 of 682
McCormick v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00900
Plaintiff:
Samuel Allan McCormick
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Massey v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Calvin Leon Massey
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles , Phyllis J. Billups and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steiger v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00893
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Defendant:
Luther Strange, Edward McFerrin, Terri Bozeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Carter et al
as 4:2016cv01837
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Webb
Respondent:
Derek Carter and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Alabama Board and Pardon Parole Members et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
Willie A. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles , Phyllis J. Billups and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wiggins v. Wright et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00883
Plaintiff:
Mary Wiggins
Defendant:
Deidra Wright and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2016cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale et al
as 2:2016cv01724
Petitioner:
Derrick L Williams
Respondent:
Mike Hale, Brandon Falls and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDougald v. Houston County Sheriff's Office et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00838
Plaintiff:
Rufus Terry McDougald, Jr.
Defendant:
Houston County Sheriff's Office, Douglas A. Valeska, Donald Valenza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bonds v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2016cv00833
Plaintiff:
Lanice Bonds
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
