Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Erika Mabes, et al v. Angela McFeeley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children and BRIAN MABES, individually and on behalf of L.M., J.R.M., and J.A.M., minor children
Defendant:
ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
MABES et al v. MCFEELEY et al
as 1:2021cv02062
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES and BRIAN MABES
Defendant:
ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. WHEELER et al
as 3:2016cv00058
Defendant:
MATT BAI, LARRY BUSCHON, TOM CIBROWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miller, Jesha v. Wheeler, Tom et al
as 3:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jesha Donaldson Miller
Defendant:
Tom Wheeler, Tom Cibrowksi, Matt Bai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O. et al v. Lyman et al
as 1:2013cv07015
Plaintiff:
Quinton O. and Taska M.
Defendant:
Anthony Lyman, Unidentified Officers and City of Chicago Ridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barbara, Daniel et al v. Sawyer County, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lyman Barbara, Sr., Lee Anne Barbara, M. B. and others
Defendant:
Sawyer County, Wisconsin, Sawyer County Board of Supervisors, Sawyer County Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wyatt v. Pollohusky et al
as 3:2012cv03068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Latee's Wyatt
Defendant:
. Pollohusky, . McGraff and Don Lyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Purdue University et al
as 4:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Collins, III
Defendant:
Purdue University, Purdue University Board of Trustees of, Purdue University Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
