Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lyman v. Door Automation Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv06677
Plaintiff:
Erica Lyman
Defendant:
Door Automation Corp. and CEO Joshua Gatoff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lyman v. Door Automation Corp. et al
as 2:2022cv06677
Plaintiff:
Erica Lyman
Defendant:
Door Automation Corp. and Joshua Gatoff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Farrington v. Poole et al
as 9:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Danny Farrington
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Poole, C.O. Heath Furbeck, C.O. Joseph Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2021cv10539
Plaintiff:
Jesse Abrams, Stanley Albansky, Joseph Alosi and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dublino v. Wende Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2019cv06354
Defendant:
Mr. Klepp, Mr. Sheftic, Lyman and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dublino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dublino v. Auburn Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2019cv00381
Defendant:
Mr. Knapp, Mr. Klepp, Mr. Wheeler and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dublino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2018cv06925
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jerald Lyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Good v. Gaspari Nutrition, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08682
Plaintiff:
Lyman Good
Defendant:
Gaspari Nutrition, Inc. , Richard Gaspari , Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
