Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lymon v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11613
Plaintiff:
Alisande Lymon
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lymon v. Wasson et al
as 2:2020cv02144
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lymon
Defendant:
City of Danville, Seth Talbott, Vermilion County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Lymon v. Wexford Health Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv50093
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Lymon
Defendant:
Wexford Health Service, Inc., Timothy Chamberlin, Illinois Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv50237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lymon v. Fifth Third Bank et al
as 1:2016cv04788
Plaintiff:
Lymon and Anthony Charles Lymon
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lymon v. Experian et al
as 3:2015cv50274
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Lymon
Defendant:
Experian, TransUnion and Equifax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lymon v. Chandler et al
as 3:2010cv50140
Petitioner:
Anthony C. Lymon
Respondent:
Nedra Chandler and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Lymon
as 1:2010cv50108
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony C Lymon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watson et al v. Cerro Flow Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
Angela Jeanette Watson, Lou Bertha May, Airlean Dye and others
Defendant:
Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation, Pharmacia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
