Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Henderson v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv02940
Defendant:
Gary Donnell Willis, Adam Bazaldua, Zarin D. Gracey and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 4:2023cv04399
Plaintiff:
Vernetta Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Rogers
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Cathy Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Sharli Powell Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goad et al v. Lyde et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Johnson
as 3:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Regis Lynn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Felder v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Kevin Felder
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Mayor of Dallas, Dallas City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Texas vs Johnson Jr.
as 6:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Arthur Lynn Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Benny Bundy and Bobby Lumpkin
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00754
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv00690
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lynn Johnson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
