Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Miller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
KAREN LYNN MILLER
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Renee Lynn Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Barga v. Village of St. Paris, Ohio et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Brenda Cook, Susan Prince and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Barga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Chadwick Miller v. Fidelity Investments
as 20-3450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS
Chadwick Miller v. Coleman Prof Serv, et al
as 20-3453
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES and JACKSON, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
Chadwick Miller v. Holmes Cnty Sheriffs Dept, et al
as 20-3431
Defendant / Appellee:
HOLMES COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, STATE OF OHIO and HOLMES COUNTY, OH PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
Chadwick Miller v. United States Marshal Service
as 20-3333
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
Miller v. Citizens Securities, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00394
Defendant:
Citizens Securities, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Lynn Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Miller v. Holmes County Sheriff Department, et al.
as 5:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Holmes County Sheriff Department, Holmes County Prosecutor Office and State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Lynn Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chadwick Miller v. City of Akron, OH Police Dept, et al
as 20-3040
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF AKRON, OH FIRE DEPARTMENT/EMS and CITY OF AKRON, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADWICK LYNN MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
