Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Piotter v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 6:2021cv06533
Plaintiff:
Lori Diaz Piotter
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAYE v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2021cv13126
Defendant:
BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, WSFS Financial Corporation doing business as CHRISTIANA TRUST also known as WSFS, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY doing business as CHRISTIANA TRUST also known as WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Jaye v. Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP et al
as 1:2021cv11546
Defendant:
BROWN, MOSKOWITZ & KALLEN, PC, Steven L. Rownland, Esq., Old Republic Title and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jaye v. Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP et al
as 1:2021cv03435
Defendant:
Brown, Moskowitz & Kallen, PC, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Jonathan H. katz, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kodra v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2020cv03682
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Lead Plaintiff:
Ina C Kodra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv11440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
