Cases 21 - 30 of 41
General Electric Capital Corporation v. Central Concrete Pumping, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00679
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Central Concrete Pumping, Inc. , Southwest Concrete Pumping, Inc. , AJ Concrete Pumping II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Graceland Center for Professional Development and Lifelong Learning, Inc. v. Anderson
as 2:2011cv02564
Plaintiff:
Graceland Center for Professional Development and Lifelong Learning, Inc.
Defendant:
Dian M. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Anderson v. Willis et al
as 2:2011cv02484
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Anderson
Defendant:
Jon C. Willis, Adam Bush, Mike Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jeanne M. Anderson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Anderson v. Stanley
as 2:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
Dean M Anderson
Defendant:
Chad Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parkhurst v. Lampert, et al
as 10-8027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK R. PARKHURST
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LAMPERT, individually and in his official capacity as Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, ROBERT ORTEGA, PATRICK M. ANDERSON and others
Anderson v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
Regina M. Anderson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. Walker
as 6:2010cv01015
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Anderson
Defendant:
Pamela A. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Fields v. Rayl et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
James Fields, Jr
Defendant:
James Brian Rayl, Pete Silva, Tulsa Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
