Cases 11 - 20 of 102
RUBINSTEIN et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv04774
Plaintiff:
ERAN RUBINSTEIN and SUSAN M. BOLTZ-RUBINSTEIN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ARCH CAPITAL GROUP (US) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott v. Meridian Bioscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08114
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Jack Kenny, John C. McIlwraith and others
Morgan v. Meridian Bioscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08057
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Jack Kenny, John C. McIlwraith and others
Coffman v. Meridian Bioscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07984
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Jack Kenny, John C. McIlwraith and others
Stein v. Meridian Bioscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07814
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc., Jack Kenny, John C. McIlwraith and others
Warren v. Meridian Bioscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07727
Plaintiff:
Justin Warren
Defendant:
Meridian Bioscience, Inc., John C. McIlwraith, James M. Anderson and others
ANDERSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00580
Petitioner:
JOHN M. ANDERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
In Re: Lu
as 22-1324
Petitioner:
FRIEDRICH LU
Respondent:
PAUL LAPROCINA, JR., MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., SCOTT KEVIN DEMELLO and others
David Webb v. USDC-WAWTA
as 22-70079
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HELATH SERVICES, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Petitioner:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-1734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
